In a bold and thought-provoking commentary, prominent lawyer Nelson Havi has waded into the ongoing political storm surrounding former President Uhuru Kenyatta and President William Ruto’s rumored truce. Speaking during an interview on Citizen TV, Havi delivered a scathing critique, asserting that neither Uhuru nor Ruto holds sway over the critical Mt Kenya voting bloc anymore. His remarks have sparked intense speculation about the future of the region’s political allegiances and the intentions behind the surprise meeting between the two leaders earlier this week.
“Uhuru Only Has One Vote”: Havi’s Blunt Assessment
Havi’s analysis begins with a sharp dismissal of Uhuru Kenyatta’s political influence in Mt Kenya. “I could be wrong, but Uhuru Kenyatta only has one vote,” he declared, emphasizing that the former president no longer commands the loyalty of his once steadfast base. According to Havi, Mt Kenya has drifted away from Uhuru, rendering him a symbolic figure with minimal actual impact on the region’s political decisions.
But Havi’s critique didn’t stop at Uhuru. He extended his analysis to President William Ruto, arguing that even with Ruto’s current position of power, controlling Mt Kenya would remain a formidable challenge. “There is nothing former President Uhuru Kenyatta and President William Ruto can do to recover the Mountain,” Havi proclaimed. “The Mountain has moved.”
A Coalition Government in the Works?
The timing of Havi’s remarks coincides with swirling rumors of a possible coalition between Uhuru and Ruto. Their private meeting on Monday at Uhuru’s Ichaweri home in Gatundu has left many Kenyans perplexed. Speculation is rife that the two leaders discussed forming a coalition government, possibly to neutralize opposition from Raila Odinga and other political forces.
Havi questioned the legitimacy and purpose of such a coalition, describing it as a potential “nefarious scheme” that Kenyans deserve to understand fully. “There is talk of a further coalition government above the coalition of Ruto and Raila Odinga, but to what end?” he asked. “These three people have tried this thing before, and Kenyans must be informed of nefarious schemes and reorganizations.”
Havi’s skepticism reflects the broader concerns of many Kenyans who view the Uhuru-Ruto meeting as a political maneuver rather than a genuine effort to address national issues.
Raila’s African Union Bid: Another Layer to the Puzzle
Another topic reportedly discussed during the private meeting was Raila Odinga’s candidature for the African Union Commission chairmanship. While details remain scarce, this discussion has added another layer of intrigue to the Uhuru-Ruto truce. Some political observers see it as a strategic move to sideline Raila from domestic politics by endorsing his bid for an international position.
However, critics, including Havi, argue that such maneuvers only serve to distract from pressing national issues. “The people of Kenya must be told the truth about all the things they plan to do,” Havi insisted, urging transparency in the leaders’ intentions and actions.
Mt Kenya’s Changing Political Landscape
The larger implication of Havi’s remarks lies in his assessment of Mt Kenya’s shifting political allegiances. Once considered the stronghold of Uhuru Kenyatta and later a crucial base for Ruto’s Kenya Kwanza coalition, the region now appears politically fragmented.
This fragmentation, according to Havi, stems from a growing disillusionment with both leaders. Mt Kenya voters, he suggested, are looking beyond the traditional political elites, seeking fresh leadership that aligns with their evolving needs and aspirations.
Public Reaction and Political Implications
Havi’s blunt comments have drawn mixed reactions from the public and political analysts. Some see his remarks as a candid reflection of the current political reality, while others view them as overly pessimistic.
Regardless of the differing opinions, Havi’s analysis underscores a significant challenge for both Uhuru and Ruto: regaining the trust and support of a region that has grown weary of their leadership.
What’s Next for Uhuru and Ruto?
As rumors of a coalition government continue to swirl, both leaders face the daunting task of convincing Kenyans—and particularly Mt Kenya voters—that their renewed partnership is in the country’s best interest.
However, with skepticism running high and the Mountain seemingly “moved,” the path to political redemption is far from straightforward. Whether they can overcome these challenges remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the dynamics of Kenyan politics are shifting, and the traditional power players must adapt or risk irrelevance.
A Nation in Flux
Havi’s remarks about Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto losing control of Mt Kenya and the broader implications of their meeting highlight the complexities of Kenya’s current political climate. As the nation watches closely, questions abound: Is a coalition government in the works? What does this mean for Raila Odinga’s role in the country’s politics? And most importantly, can Mt Kenya’s political loyalty be won back?
The answers to these questions will not only shape the future of Uhuru and Ruto but also determine the direction of Kenyan politics in the coming years. For now, the Mountain may have moved, but the game is far from over.
